Nick Crabb logo
| Home | Mail me 

Headed out into the cosmos

When I was four and half, I watched Apollo 17 landing on the Moon and I thought it was it was an everyday event.

Nasa,Pat Rawlings
I then grew up reading Arthur C Clarke's science fiction novels and watching Star Trek and 2001:A Space Odyssey.

I always believed that man would stay on the Moon, build a base there, construct vast wheel-shaped space stations where interplanetary ships could dock, and I expected planetfall on Mars not many years hence.

When I grew older and these things did not happen, when Prime Ministers and Presidents were still involved in sleeze.and the planet was being polluted, I realised that the science fiction gurus were too optimistic.

Their vision of the future may well be right 1,000 years hence, but they were wildly wrong about the short-term.

But perhaps the future needed to catch up with them, and perhaps it is starting anew.

More than science

In his speech at Nasa President George W Bush said: "Human beings are headed out into the cosmos," and it hopefully it's true this time.

The first President Bush made the same commitment in the late 80's, but his initiative was so expensive, so ill-thought-out, that it folded under its own financial projections.

Surprisingly his idiot son seems to have made a better job of sorting out the money. But even so, money will be a key problem.

Nasa,Pat Rawlings
The increased funding Nasa will be getting to put the new vision into place will not be great. It will have $86bn over the next five years - an increase certainly, but not a dramatic one.

Many scientists lambast manned spaceflight saying that unmanned probes do better science far more cheaply. But in doing so, they fail to recognise that what is being proposed here is bigger than science.

It is important that we explore and strive, and for humankind to become a multi-planet species. Our Earth will not be safe forever and, as the Americans have shown us all, leaving home revitalises and renews the human spirit. But back to the money.

The sum of all things

Should not the money be spent on earthly things, such as really exploiting the genetic knowledge in the human genome so that we can truly conquer disease and possibly the aging process?

Yes. But we should do it as well and not instead of. We have the money we need if we spend it wisely. Indeed, our return to the Moon and the voyage to Mars will only really mean something if we solve our problems on Earth as well.

Space exploration is only part of the sum of all things we must do.

Nasa,Pat Rawlings

Imagined futures

So it is from about 2008 onwards, with new missions to the Moon, and the development of a new manned spacecraft, that things will really start to seem different.

President Bush says he wants a Moonbase by 2020. Because the techniques and technology for a manned Mars mission are to be tested on the Moon, this has pushed the Mars mission to near 2030, I expect.

Most engineers believe that a Moonbase is technologically possible, especially if it is sited at one of the lunar poles where the ice in the soil would be a valuable resource for drinking water and rocket fuel.

There are also craters there that are in permanent shadow and could be used to protect crews from solar radiation flares.

And what an inspiration it would be. Imagine schoolchildren all over the world logging on to the Moonbase website for a lesson in science, or to view the long shadows and bright mountains of the lunar polelands on various webcams - live from the Moon.

A generation has grown up since humans left the Moon; a generation that has never known a time when mankind went somewhere in space.

Perhaps, if this all works, future generations will not be so deprived, and the future many young minds have dreamed they were entering may actually come to pass.